Methodological Considerations in Comparative Readability Analyses of Large Language Model Outputs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66288/actamedi.2026.63Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Large language models, Readability, Health Literacy, Patient EducationAbstract
This submission is a Letter to the Editor. Abstract is not required according to the journal guidelines.
References
Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Regression Methods in Biostatistics. New York: Springer; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1353-0
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1995;57(1):289–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
Günay E, et al. Comparison of emergency medicine specialist, cardiologist, and GPT-4 in electrocardiography assessment. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;XX:XXX–XXX. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.017
Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Furkan Çağrı Oğuzlar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
