Evolving Concepts in the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis
Evolving Concepts in the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681325Keywords:
Interstitial cystitis, bladder pain syndrome, bibliometric analysis, research trends, citation analysis, chronic pelvic painAbstract
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze global research trends, collaborative networks, and thematic evolution in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) treatment literature over the past decade using comprehensive bibliometric methods.
Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection database for publications from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2025. The search strategy employed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to IC/BPS and treatment modalities. Bibliometric indicators including publication trends, citation patterns, international collaborations, and thematic evolution were analyzed using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R package. Simple linear regression analysis was performed to assess temporal trends in research output.
Results: A total of 1,456 publications (1,083 original articles and 373 reviews) were identified, generating 26,503 citations. Annual publication output demonstrated a statistically significant upward trend (R² = 0.569, p = 0.011), increasing from 113 publications in 2016 to 165 in 2025, with a peak of 196 publications in 2022. The United States dominated research output (79 documents) and total citations (1,746), while Belgium (39.52 citations/document) and Sweden (45.5 citations/document) showed the highest citation impact relative to publication volume. The journal Neurourology and Urodynamics published the most articles (68), whereas Journal of Urology accumulated the highest total citations (1,165). Co-occurrence analysis revealed a paradigm shift from bladder-centric approaches (intravesical therapy, hydrodistension) toward neurobiological mechanisms (central sensitization, chronic pain, neuroinflammation) and personalized medicine approaches (phenotyping, biomarkers). International collaboration analysis identified strong research networks, particularly among USA-UK-Canada and European consortia.
Conclusions: This bibliometric analysis reveals sustained growth and evolving focus in IC/BPS research over the past decade. The field is transitioning from traditional bladder-centric interventions toward comprehensive neurobiological understanding and phenotype-directed therapies. Geographic disparities in research productivity highlight the need for enhanced global collaboration. The significant increase in publications addressing central mechanisms and multidisciplinary approaches reflects maturation of the field and provides valuable insights for future research priorities and funding allocation.
References
1. Hayes, B., et al., Patient related outcomes for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome recommendations for clinical trials and general urology practice. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2025. 44(7): p. 1455-1465.
2. Thelwall, M., Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of information science, 2008. 34(4): p. 605-621.
3. Ates, T., et al., Global research trends in minimally invasive treatments for kidney stones: A bibliometric analysis (2015–2024). Urolithiasis, 2025. 53(1): p. 116.
4. Pritchard, A., Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 1969. 25: p. 348.
5. Diem, A. and S.C. Wolter, The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in higher education, 2013. 54(1): p. 86-114.
6. Ateş, T., et al., Hotspots and Research Trends in Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization (1997-2025). Bulletin of Urooncology, 2025.
7. Pranckutė, R., Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 2021. 9(1): p. 12.
8. Van Eck, N. and L. Waltman, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 2010. 84(2): p. 523-538.
9. Aria, M. and C. Cuccurullo, bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 2017. 11(4): p. 959-975.
10. Kokol, P., H. Blažun Vošner, and J. Završnik, Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 2021. 38(2): p. 125-138.
11. Berry, S.H., et al., Prevalence of symptoms of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis among adult females in the United States. The Journal of urology, 2011. 186(2): p. 540-544.
12. Thelwall, M. and P. Sud, Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 2022. 3(1): p. 37-50.
13. Homolak, J., I. Kodvanj, and D. Virag, Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics, 2020. 124(3): p. 2687-2701.
14. Fry, C.V., et al., Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research. PloS one, 2020. 15(7): p. e0236307.
15. Clemens, J.Q., et al., Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. The Journal of urology, 2022. 208(1): p. 34-42.
16. Çatal, B., Akman, Y., Şükür, E., & Azboy, I. , Worldwide arthroplasty research productivity and contribution of Turkey. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 2018. 52: p. 376 - 381.
17. Abreu-Mendes, P., et al., Myofascial pelvic pain: best orientation and clinical practice. Position of the European association of Urology guidelines panel on chronic pelvic pain. European Urology Focus, 2023. 9(1): p. 172-177.
18. Nickel, J.C., T. Cotechini, and R.C. Doiron, Secondary analysis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients enrolled in a recurrent urinary tract infection prevention study provides a novel paradigm for etio-pathogenesis and practical management of this infection phenotype. Pathogens, 2024. 13(5): p. 396.
19. Taneja, R., et al., Diagnostic and therapeutic cystoscopy in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: systematic review of literature and consensus on methodology. International Urogynecology Journal, 2023. 34(6): p. 1165-1173.
20. Namugosa, M., et al., Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Endometriosis in Patients With IC/BPS. Urogynecology, 2025. 31(2): p. 131-138.
21. Niino, C.A., et al., Bladder instillation patterns in a cohort of women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Urogynecology, 2023. 29(11): p. 914-919.
22. Dobberfuhl, A.D., Pathophysiology, assessment, and treatment of overactive bladder symptoms in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2022. 41(8): p. 1958-1966.
23. Su, Y., et al., Electroacupuncture Neural Stimulation Mitigates Bladder Dysfunction and Mechanical Allodynia in Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cystitis through Downregulation of the BDNF–TrkB Signaling Pathway. eneuro, 2025. 12(3).
24. Wang, Y., et al., Integrated identification of immune-related therapeutic targets for interstitial cystitis via multi-algorithm machine learning: transcriptomic profiling and in vivo experimental validation. Frontiers in Immunology, 2025. 16: p. 1636855.
25. Xin, K., et al., Exploring promising biomarkers based on pathogenic mechanisms in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Nature Reviews Urology, 2025: p. 1-19.
26. Farrar, J.T., et al., Widespread pain phenotypes impact treatment efficacy results in randomized clinical trials for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain network study. Pain, 2022: p. 10.1097.
27. Liapis, I. and M. Parsons, Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis, in Textbook of Female Urology and Urogynecology. 2023, CRC Press. p. 585-597.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibrahim Halil Sukur, S. Geyik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.