Trends and Thematic Evolution in Frontal QRS-T Angle Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2020 to 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18663442Keywords:
Fontal QRS-T angle, Electrocardiography, Ventricular repolarization, Bibliometric analysis, Research trends, Keyword co-occurrence, Citation analysisAbstract
Aim: The frontal QRS-T angle (fQRST) has gained increasing attention as a simple, widely accessible electrocardiographic marker reflecting ventricular depolarization-repolarization heterogeneity and electrical instability. Beyond cardiac disorders, emerging evidence links fQRST to systemic inflammation, metabolic stress, and a variety of acute clinical conditions. Despite this growing interest, the global evolution, conceptual structure, and research dynamics of fQRST studies have not been systematically characterized.
Methodology: A bibliometric analysis was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection to identify original research articles on fQRST published between 2020 and 2025. After data cleaning and standardization, 138 eligible articles were analyzed. Performance indicators -including publication trends, country and institution productivity, journal distribution, and citation metrics- were evaluated using Bibliometrix (R). Keyword co-occurrence patterns and country-level collaboration structures were visualized through VOSviewer.
Results: Research output on fQRST increased substantially during the study period, peaking in 2023. Türkiye contributed the majority of publications (79.7%), followed by China, Italy, and Japan. The most influential articles primarily focused on coronary syndromes, repolarization abnormalities, COVID-19, arrhythmia risk, and the prognostic implications of ventricular electrical heterogeneity. Seventy-one journals published fQRST-related studies, with the Journal of Electrocardiology serving as the leading outlet. Keyword evolution demonstrated a clear thematic shift from early electrophysiological and measurement-oriented terms toward clinically oriented concepts such as mortality, heart failure, arrhythmia, and systemic inflammation. Collaboration patterns were predominantly national, indicating limited international research integration.
Conclusion: Scientific interest in the frontal QRS-T angle has expanded markedly in recent years, accompanied by thematic diversification and increasing clinical relevance. The concentration of research productivity within specific regions and the limited extent of global collaboration underscore the need for broader, multicenter efforts. Overall, the findings highlight the growing importance of fQRST as an accessible biomarker and support future research incorporating large-scale datasets and advanced analytical methods.
References
1. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, Hancock EW, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1109-27.
2. Macfarlane PW. The frontal plane QRS-T angle. Europace 2012;14:773-5.
3. Young WJ, Haessler J, Benjamins JW, Repetto L, Yao J, Isaacs A, et al. Genetic architecture of spatial electrical biomarkers for cardiac arrhythmia and relationship with cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun 2023;14:1411.
4. Aro AL, Huikuri HV, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Rissanen HA, Reunanen A, Anttonen O. QRS-T angle as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in a middle-aged general population. Europace 2012;14:872-6.
5. Selvaraj S, Ilkhanoff L, Burke MA, Freed BH, Lang RM, Martinez EE, Shah SJ. Association of the frontal QRS-T angle with adverse cardiac remodeling, impaired ventricular function, and worse outcomes in HFpEF. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:74-82.
6. Zhang X, Zhu Q, Zhu L, Jiang H, Xie J, Huang W, Xu B. Spatial/frontal QRS-T angle predicts all-cause and cardiac mortality: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136174.
7. Çaprak R, Oğuzlar FÇ, Armağan HH, Cesur E. Frontal QRS-T angle as an early predictor of mortality in sepsis. Am J Emerg Med 2025.
8. Güngörer B, Demirtaş B, Kundi H, Özgürlük İ, Ocak M. ICEBc: A new predictor for hemodialysis need in patients with crush injury—experience from the February 6, 2023 Türkiye earthquake. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2025;32:e70020.
9. Oğuzlar FÇ, Cesur E, Armağan HH, Yalçin IG, Hatip AY, Göksu EC. Frontal QRS-T angle and inflammatory indices as predictors of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2025;104:e45692. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000045692
10. Gunduz R, Yildiz BS, Ozgur S, Ozen MB, Bakir EO, Ozdemir IH, et al. Frontal QRS/T angle can predict mortality in COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med 2022;58:66-72.
11. Arda U, Özdemir S. The frontal QRS-T angle in predicting prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Postgrad Med 2025;137:702-8.
12. Clarivate Analytics. Web of Science Core Collection. 2025. Available at: https://www.webofscience.com
13. Hassan MAU, Mushtaq S, Rehman A, Al-Qaisi MA, Yang Z. A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited articles about artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram. Egypt Heart J 2025;77:51.
14. Powell KR, Peterson SR. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics. Nurs Outlook 2017;65:572-8.
15. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
16. Porthan K, Virolainen J, Hiltunen TP, Viitasalo M, Väänänen H, Dabek J, et al. Relationship of electrocardiographic repolarization measures to echocardiographic left ventricular mass in men with hypertension. J Hypertens 2007;25:1951-1957.
17. Elmas AN, Fedai H, Toprak K, Taşcanov MB, Altıparmak İH, Biçer A, et al. The association of electrical risk score with prognosis in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol 2025;29:11.
18. Dawood A, Shabbir M. Frontal QRS-T angle as a predictor of the complexity of coronary artery disease in adults presenting to a tertiary care cardiac hospital. Open Access Public Health Health Admin Rev 2025;3:182-189.
19. Zorlu Ç, Açıkel B, Ömür SE. Frontal plane QRS–T angle is a predictor of ventricular arrhythmia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2025;30:e70062.
20. Jogu HR, O’Neal WT, Broughton ST, Shah AJ, Zhang ZM, Soliman EZ. Frontal QRS-T angle and the risk of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2017;22:e12388.
21. Eyuboglu M, Celik A. Frontal plane QRS‐T angle predicts early recurrence of acute atrial fibrillation after successful pharmacological cardioversion with intravenous amiodarone. J Clin Pharm Ther 2021;46:1750-1756.
22. Gotsman I, Keren A, Hellman Y, Banker J, Lotan C, Zwas DR. Usefulness of electrocardiographic frontal QRS-T angle to predict increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1452-1459.
23. Tastan E, İnci Ü. The relationship between in-hospital mortality and frontal QRS-T angle in patients with COVID-19. Cureus 2022;14:e28506.
24. May O, Graversen CB, Johansen MØ, Arildsen H. A large frontal QRS-T angle is a strong predictor of the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications 2017;31:551-555.
25. Lown MT, Munyombwe T, Harrison W, West RM, Hall CA, Morrell C, et al. Association of frontal QRS-T angle–age risk score on admission electrocardiogram with mortality in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:307-313.
26. Lundahl G, Gransberg L, Bergqvist G, Bergström G, Bergfeldt L. Automatic identification of a stable QRST complex for non-invasive evaluation of human cardiac electrophysiology. PLoS One 2020;15:e0239074.
27. Yedigoz M, Avci A, Sener K, Avci BS, Yesiloglu O, Urfalioglu AB, et al. A new electrocardiographic evaluation in hyperkalemia: frontal QRS-T angle. Ir J Med Sci 2025;194:1471-1476.
28. Erdoğan O, Erdoğan T, Özkök S, Fetullahoğlu Z, Saçar DE, Seyithanoğlu D, et al. Sarcopenia and arrhythmia risk: an electrocardiographic analysis in older adults. Eur J Geriatr Gerontol 2025. doi:10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2025.2025-6-7.
29. Usalp S, Bağırtan B. A novel electrocardiographic marker for predicting total mortality in ischemic stroke: frontal QRS-T angle. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2025;53:29-34.
30. Kaya A, Karahan MA, Tercan M, Esercan A, Bostanci Erkmen M, Cicek OF. Comparison of the effect of spinal anesthesia applied in elective cesarean cases on frontal QRS angle in anemic and non-anemic patients. J Clin Med 2025;14:7827.
31. Green M, Heddle B, Dassen W, Wehr M, Abdollah H, Brugada P, et al. Value of QRS alteration in determining the site of origin of narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1983;68:368-373.
32. Ameziane H, Zahidi Y, El-Moufid M, Medromi H, Machkour N, Rabbah N. Assessing Africa’s position in the development of AI-enabled ECG devices. F1000Res 2025;13:1115.
33. Umaç H, Durak A, Tuncer M, Yıldırım B, Boleken ME, Atar E, et al. Assessment of frontal QRS–T angle in distinguishing mild and severe acute pancreatitis in emergency department: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:e40743.
34. Algül E, Özbeyaz NB, Şahan HF, Aydınyılmaz F, Gezer E, Sunman H, et al. Frontal QRS-T angle is associated with severity and prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism. J Electrocardiol 2023;79:8-12.
35. Durgun M, Karahan MZ. The importance of frontal QRS-T angle in predicting the effectiveness and success of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Cureus 2023;15:e33268.
36. Hocanli I, Tanriverdi Z, Kabak M, Gungoren F, Tascanov MB. The relationship between frontal QRS‐T angle and the severity of newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14500.
37. Eyuboglu M. Electrocardiographic alterations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. World J Cardiol 2022;14:187-189.
38. Tekin YK, Tekin G, Nur N, Korkmaz I, Yurtbay S. Frontal QRS-T angle as a predictive marker for myocardial damage in acute carbon monoxide poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 2021;40:S583-S592.
39. Butterfield TA, Best TM, Merrick MA. The dual roles of neutrophils and macrophages in inflammation: a critical balance between tissue damage and repair. J Athl Train 2006;41:457-465.
40. He W, Chen P, Chen Q, Cai Z, Zhang P. Cytokine storm: behind the scenes of the collateral circulation after acute myocardial infarction. Inflamm Res 2022;71:1143-1158.
41. Liberatore AMA, Del-Massa EC, Gondim LR, Yamamura ALB, Koh IHJ. Early fluid therapy with splanchnic sympathetic blockage prevented microcirculation damage, gut bacterial overgrowth, bacterial translocation and mortality in sepsis. Crit Care 2012;16(Suppl 3):P92.
42. Tekin A, Tanriverdi Z, Kapici Y, Guc B, Karamustafalioglu O. Comparison of frontal QRS-T angle in patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers. J Psychiatr Res 2022;149:76-82.
43. Kapici Y, Örüm D, Bıyıklı K, Markirt S, Tekin A. Comparison of frontal QRS-T angle and inflammatory parameters in patients with major depressive disorder and healthy controls. Psychiatr Danub 2025;37:30-37.
44. Kılıçaslan F, Tan A, Tanriverdi Z. Evaluation of frontal QRS-T angle in children with ADHD and healthy controls. J Atten Disord 2025;29:165-173.
45. Crumb WJ, Ekins S, Sarazan RD, Wikel JH, Wrighton SA, Carlson C, et al. Effects of antipsychotic drugs on Ito, INa, Isus, IK1, and hERG: QT prolongation, structure–activity relationship, and network analysis. Pharm Res 2006;23:1133-1143.
46. Arteyeva NV. Dispersion of ventricular repolarization: temporal and spatial. World J Cardiol 2020;12:437-449.
47. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2020;58:155-159.
48. Erdogan G, Yontar OC, Yenercag M, Gul S, Arslan U. Frontal QRS-T angle predicts SYNTAX score in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2020;61:86-91.
49. Işık F, Aslan B, Çap M, Akyüz A, İnci Ü, Baysal E, et al. The relationship between coronary slow-flow and frontal QRS-T angle. J Electrocardiol 2021;66:43-47.
50. Karakayali M, Artac I, Omar T, Rencuzogullari I, Karabag Y, Cinar T, et al. The association between frontal QRS-T angle and reverse dipper status in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Blood Press Monit 2023;28:96-102.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Furkan Çağrı Oğuzlar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
