Impact Characteristics of Pneumothorax Videos Published on YouTube: 2020-2025

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17608045

Keywords:

Pneumothorax, Youtube, Video education

Abstract

Background: Pneumothorax is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by air accumulation in the pleural space, leading to partial or complete lung collapse. YouTube, as one of the most widely used digital platforms, has become a significant educational tool for medical learning. However, the quality and reliability of medical content on the platform remain variable. Given the limited number of studies assessing pneumothorax-related videos, this study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and engagement metrics of pneumothorax videos published on YouTube between 2020 and 2025.

Methods: A custom YouTube API-based data extraction tool was developed to collect pneumothorax-related videos and metadata. After excluding incomplete or irrelevant videos, a total of 570 videos were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the interaction index was calculated as [(likes – dislikes) / total views] × 100. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages, while non-normally distributed numerical variables were presented as medians and interquartile ranges. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: Video publication increased markedly over time, peaking in 2025 (52.5%). The largest number of videos originated from India (22.1%) and the United States (18.2%). The interaction index significantly differed by year (test statistic=16.255, p=0.006), with 2025 showing higher engagement compared to 2024 (p=0.009). Median video duration was 60 seconds, median like count was 21, and median view rate was 645.33%.

Conclusion: Despite increasing engagement, variability in video quality underscores the need for medical professionals and educators to contribute accurate and evidence-based content.

References

1. Shen KR, Cerfolio RJ. Decision making in the management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with severe emphysema. Thorac Surg Clin 2009; 19: 233–238.

2. Light RW. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148: 245–248.

3. Fujimoto K, Kitaguchi Y, Kubo K, Honda T. Clinical analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes classified using high-resolution computed tomography. Respirology 2006; 11: 731–740.

4. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest 2001; 119: 590–602.

5. Isaka M, Asai K, Urabe N. Surgery for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: risk factors for recurrence and morbidity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17: 247–252.

6. Mohamed F, Shoufan A. Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):86

7. Grosberg D, et al. Frequent surfing on social health networks is associated with increased knowledge and patient health activation. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e212.

8. https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3?hl=tr

9. ZORTUK, Ö. (2025). Youtube Pneumothorax Scraper (1.4). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17380409

10. Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J. Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e17187.

11. Wang M, et al. Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):57.

12. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903.

13. Yagiz B, et al. The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42(12):3311–20.

14. Yang S, Zhan J, Xu X. Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer? Endocrine. 2023;81(2):270–6.

15. Botelho, M.G.; Gao, X.; Jagannathan, N. A qualitative analysis of students’ perceptions of videos to support learning in a psychomotor skills course. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2019, 23, 20–27.

16. Bedel, C., Korkut, M., Selvi, F., & Zortuk, Ö. (2021). The immature granulocyte count is a new predictor of the 30-day mortality in intracerebral haemorrhage patients: preliminary study. Indian Journal of Neurosurgery, 10(02), 114-120.

17. Botelho, M.G. Evaluation of student use of videos to support learning in a simulation laboratory course: A perception and analytics approach. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2019, 10, e12453.

18. Kaval, M.E.; Demirci, G.K.; Atesci, A.A.; Sarsar, F.; Dindaroğlu, F.; Güneri, P.; Caliskan, M.K. YouTube™ as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysis. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2022, 161, 104732

19. Aldallal, S.; Yates, J.; Ajrash, M. Use of YouTube™ as a self-directed learning resource in oral surgery among undergraduate dental students: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 57, 1049–1052]

20. Fu, M.W.; Kalaichelvan, A.; Liebman, L.S.; Burns, L.E. Exploring predoctoral dental student use of YouTube as a learning tool for clinical endodontic procedures. J. Dent. Educ. 2022, 86, 726–735.

21. Bedel C, Tomruk Ö. Characteristics of geriatric patients presenting to an emergency department of a university hospital. Med J SDU. 2018;25(4):393-9.

22. Obornev AD, Pishchik VG, Atyukov MA, et al. Katamenial’nyj pnevmotoraks. Osnovnye kharakteristiki zabolevaniya na osnovanii obzora literatury. Klinicheskaya bol’nitsa. 2016;4(18):29-35. (In Russ.).

23. Uzun, A., Korkut, M., Kartal, M., & Bedel, C. (2020). Evaluation of modified STONE score in patients presenting to the emergency department with flank pain. Urological Science, 31(5), 221-225.

24. Tezikov YuV, Lipatov IS, Kalinkina OB, et al. Catamenial Pneumotorax as a Manifestation of Pulmonary Forms of Endometriosis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2019;6:156-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.6.156-162

25. Voskresensky OV, Smolyar AN, Damirov MM, et al. Torakal’nyj endometrioz i katamenial’nyj pnevmotoraks. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014;10:4-9. (In Russ.).

26. Ciriaco P, et al. Surgical Treatment Of Catamenial Pneumothorax: A Single Centre Experience. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2009;8(3):349-352. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.190975

27. Uzun, A., Korkut, M., Kartal, M., & Bedel, C. (2020). Evaluation of modified STONE score in patients presenting to the emergency department with flank pain. Urological Science, 31(5), 221-225.

28. Ichiki Y, et al. Surgical Treatment of Catamenial Pneumothorax: Report of Three Cases. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2015;38(3):180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.09.014

Published

2025-11-15

How to Cite

Zortuk, O. (2025). Impact Characteristics of Pneumothorax Videos Published on YouTube: 2020-2025. Acta Medica Young Doctors, 1(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17608045